Jump to content

4F-MDMB-BINACA: Difference between revisions

From WHDC Academics
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The current study indicates that the test compounds produce locomotor depression similar to that of Δ9-THC, and fully substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ9-THC. In summary, these 5F-MDMB-PINACA, MDMB-CHIMICA, MDMB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, and AMB-FUBINACA have similar abuse liability as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and should be controlled in a similar fashion. Much of the in vivo adb butinaca testing of the synthetic cannabinoid compounds have been pre-clinical studies focused on their cannabinoid-like effects or like the present study, focused on their abuse liability. There is indication that at least some of the first-generation synthetic cannabinoids act at receptors other than cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 (Wiley et al., 2016), and a compound from the present study, 5F-MDMB-PINACA, was found to activate midbrain dopamine neurons, but not serotonin neurons (Asaoka et al., 2016<br><br><br>LC-QTOF-MS represents a significant advancement in the field of drug detection, offering higher sensitivity, specificity, and a broader spectrum of detectable substances. Despite all negative results in the point-of-care test for recreational drugs, the liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) analysis showed that the liquid of the e-cigarette contained ADB-BUTINACA, a synthetic cannabinoid. We report a 27-year-old man who was admitted to the emergency room because of sudden adb butinaca headache, nausea, vertigo, red eyes and palpitations. Synthetic cannabinoids are gaining popularity globally and detection is not commonly availabl<br><br><br>These synthetic cannabinoids act [https://cannabinoidsrc4f-adb.com/ adb butinaca] directly at cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors as does Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) found in marijuana, but have different chemical structures unrelated to Δ9-THC, different metabolism, and often greater toxicity (Fantegrossi et al., 2014). Discriminative stimulus effects were tested in rats trained to discriminate Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (3 mg/kg, 30-min pretreatment). 5F-MDMB-PINACA (also known as 5F-ADB, 5F-ADB-PINACA), MDMB-CHIMICA, MDMB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, and AMB-FUBINACA (also known as FUB-AMB, MMB-FUBINACA) were tested for in vivo cannabinoid-like effects to assess their abuse liabilit<br><br>In general, the locomotor depressant and discriminative stimulus effects have been observed at doses that do not produce adverse effects, although tremors were observed upon handling in mice that received JWH-210 (Gatch et al., 2016), and 5F-AMB produced sustained vocalization and convulsions in rats (Gatch et al., 2018<br><br>The chemical structures of the recent synthetic cannabinoids are unlike that of Δ9-THC, but are largely based on the structure of older synthetic cannabinoids that are known to have substantial abuse liability (Fig. 1<br><br>Legal status <br>Briefly, the FOB test was comprised of several behavioral changes including catalepsy, traction, tremor, convulsion, exopthalmos, piloerection, salivation, lacrimation, diarrhea, skin coloration, pinna reflex, righting reflex, and death. The FOB test was performed using published procedures (Moser et al., 1989) with some modifications. However, because of their subjective properties, it is necessary to set up a more objective automated measurement to determine their neurotoxicity. However, there are only a couple of anecdotal reports suspecting the possibility of their neurotoxicity with no scientific evidence (Cohen et al., 2012; McGuinness and Newell, 2012; Harris and Brown, 2013; Hermanns et al., 2013<br><br><br>§ (3) of the Hungarian act of Forensic Experts (2016.XXIX), the data of the reported case can be utilized freely for scientific and educational purposes without special ethical permission. These results indicate that the simultaneous intoxication of SCRA and ethanol directly and exclusively caused the death of the two victims. The victims did not have any significant diseases that could have contributed to the outcome. Very limited data are available in the scientific literature about the possible effects of the combined consumption of SCRAs and ethanol. Several case reports describe that the presence of a little ng/mL (0.37–4.1) of SCRAs and a high—but not lethal—concentration of ethanol (1.45–2.7 g/L) directly and exclusively contributed to the death of the victim [24–27] (Table 2). The fact that 4F-MDMB-BINACA was not detected in postmortem urine samples is partly explained by the high rate of hepatic metabolism of SCRAs [11, 14, 22], but also suggests that the victims consumed 4F-MDMB-BINACA shortly before their death<br><br><br>High resolution mass spectrometry such as LC-QTOF-MS allows the detection and identification of a broad spectrum of recreational drugs, including new psychoactive substances. A point-of-care drugs of abuse (DOA) test was initially performed on the urine of the patient. He confirmed drinking 750 ml energy drink without any further consumption of food and using an e-cigarette from Gaziantep, Turkey 10 seconds before the onset of his first symptoms. He usually smokes a pack of cigarettes a day and sometimes smokes e-cigarettes. Combined with non-specific, transient symptoms, clinical recognition of SCRA intoxication is challenging .<br>Data availability <br>The intensity is plotted against the retention time for both chromatograms, demonstrating the adb butinaca presence and elution profiles of nicotine and ADB-BUTINACA in the analysed vape liquid sample. LC-QTOF-MS Chromatograms of Nicotine (Top) and ADB-BUTINACA (Bottom) in the Vape Liquid used by the patient. The LC-QTOF-MS analysis showed that the e-liquid contained nicotine and ADB-BUTINACA (Fig. 1). Because the point-of-care DOA test is generally not able to detect synthetic recreational drug substances, the liquid of the e-cigarette was thereafter screened using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) on the Waters™ Xevo G3 QTOF MS system. After eating a light meal and drinking caffeinated sports drinks at the ER, the nausea complaints of the patient were reduced and the patient was discharged hom
Due to the unknown toxicity of newly emerging SCRAs, forensic assessments of cases involving these substances are challenging. According to the reported cases and reviews of the scientific literature, concurrent ethanol consumption should amplify the toxicity of SCRAs. The concentration of 4F-MDMB-BINACA in the postmortem blood was 2.50 and 2.34 ng/mL, and blood alcohol concentration was 2.11 and 2.49 g/L, respectively. Two fatal cases are reported caused by simultaneous consumption of 4F-MDMB-BINACA and ethanol.<br>Fig. 2. <br>The precursor ion m/z 396 (B10, B12/B15) was 32 Da higher than the parent drug, 4F-MDMB-BINACA, suggesting the addition of two hydroxy groups. All the below explanations for transformations into metabolites are based on the data shown in Fig. Metabolites were identified according to their precursor ions, product ions, and fragmentation patterns (Fig. 1). Traditional in-vivo metabolism studies to generate human metabolites of drugs relied heavily on the use of whole animal model systems, which are expensive, limited by drug administration amount, influenced by species variation and faced by many ethical issues. Eight in-vivo metabolites tentatively identified were mainly products of ester hydrolysis with or without additional dehydrogenation, N-dealkylation, monohydroxylation and oxidative defluorination with further oxidation to butanoic acid.<br>Fig. 1. <br>Monitoring metabolism of synthetic cannabinoid 4F-MDMB-BINACA via high-resolution mass spectrometry assessed in cultured hepatoma cell line, fungus, [https://cannabinoidsrc4f-adb.com/ adb butinaca] liver microsomes and confirmed using urine samples The threshold for fatal overdose of combined use of SCRAs and ethanol can be estimated as a little ng/mL (0.37–4.1 ng/mL according to the reported cases) of SCRA and 1.5–2.5 g/L of ethanol. The reported cases and reviews of the scientific literature suggest a possible synergistic effect between SCRAs and ethanol, because their combined use clearly increases their toxicity. The victim died due to severe necrotizing pancreatitis and acute kidney injury evolving into multi-organ failure 11 days after hospital admission . Studies have found no unequivocal synergistic effect between THC and ethanol at low or moderate ethanol doses [29, 30], but no data on high doses of ethanol are available. Given that THC and ethanol act on the same receptors, data on their simultaneous use may yield important insights in this regard.<br>Fungus C. elegans <br>Concentrations of 4F-MDMB-BINACA in the postmortem blood samples were 2.50 and 2.34 ng/mL, which are in line with published data. Although the lethal dose of 4F-MDMB-BINACA is unknown, its concentration in postmortem blood samples was found to range between 0.10 and 2.90 ng/mL . In SCRA-related cases in which the deceased suffered from heart disease, the SCRA concentration in the postmortem blood was less than 1 ng/mL . Concentrations of SCRAs in postmortem cases cover a wide range ; however, some reports of survival have also been published—even at relatively high blood SCRA concentrations [19, 20<br><br><br>Acute kidney damage and even kidney failure have been reported following use of synthetic cannabinoids (Davidson, et al., 2017). One recent study has looked at other mechanisms of action in some of the older synthetic cannabinoids and reported that some produced varying amounts of activity at sites which are related to cardiotoxicity and heart disease (Wiley et al., 2016). It is not known whether the increased toxicity is due only to activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors more strongly than Δ9-THC or whether these "super-strength" cannabinoids produce effects at other receptors. A major cause of concern is that some of the more recently seen synthetic cannabinoids are more likely to produce extremely toxic effects than the older synthetics (Tai and Fantegrossi, 2017<br><br><br>§ (3) of the Hungarian act of Forensic Experts (2016.XXIX), the data of the reported case can be utilized freely for scientific and educational purposes without special ethical permission. These results indicate that the simultaneous intoxication of SCRA and ethanol directly and exclusively caused the death of the two victims. The victims did not have any significant diseases that could have contributed to the outcome. Very limited data are available in the scientific literature about the possible effects of the combined consumption of SCRAs and ethanol. Several case reports describe that the presence of a little ng/mL (0.37–4.1) of SCRAs and a high—but not lethal—concentration of ethanol (1.45–2.7 g/L) directly and exclusively contributed to the death of the victim [24–27] (Table 2). The fact that 4F-MDMB-BINACA was not detected in postmortem urine samples is partly explained by the high rate of hepatic metabolism of SCRAs [11, 14, 22], but also suggests that the victims consumed 4F-MDMB-BINACA shortly before their death<br><br><br>LC-QTOF-MS represents a significant advancement in the field of drug detection, offering higher sensitivity, specificity, and a broader spectrum of detectable substances. Despite all negative results in the point-of-care test for recreational drugs, the liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) analysis showed that the liquid of the e-cigarette contained ADB-BUTINACA, a synthetic cannabinoid. We report a 27-year-old man who was admitted to the emergency room because of sudden adb butinaca headache, nausea, vertigo, red eyes and palpitations. Synthetic cannabinoids are gaining popularity globally and detection is not commonly available.<br>Data availability <br>When clinical presentation and/or initial DOA testing results are inconclusive, additional testing with LC-QTOF-MS can be valuable and is recommended. SCRAs and other NPS may not be detected by point-of-care DOA tests. In this case, the point-of-care DOA urine screening was not able to detect the synthetic cannabinoid ADB-BUTINAC

Latest revision as of 09:53, 24 May 2026

Due to the unknown toxicity of newly emerging SCRAs, forensic assessments of cases involving these substances are challenging. According to the reported cases and reviews of the scientific literature, concurrent ethanol consumption should amplify the toxicity of SCRAs. The concentration of 4F-MDMB-BINACA in the postmortem blood was 2.50 and 2.34 ng/mL, and blood alcohol concentration was 2.11 and 2.49 g/L, respectively. Two fatal cases are reported caused by simultaneous consumption of 4F-MDMB-BINACA and ethanol.
Fig. 2.
The precursor ion m/z 396 (B10, B12/B15) was 32 Da higher than the parent drug, 4F-MDMB-BINACA, suggesting the addition of two hydroxy groups. All the below explanations for transformations into metabolites are based on the data shown in Fig. Metabolites were identified according to their precursor ions, product ions, and fragmentation patterns (Fig. 1). Traditional in-vivo metabolism studies to generate human metabolites of drugs relied heavily on the use of whole animal model systems, which are expensive, limited by drug administration amount, influenced by species variation and faced by many ethical issues. Eight in-vivo metabolites tentatively identified were mainly products of ester hydrolysis with or without additional dehydrogenation, N-dealkylation, monohydroxylation and oxidative defluorination with further oxidation to butanoic acid.
Fig. 1.
Monitoring metabolism of synthetic cannabinoid 4F-MDMB-BINACA via high-resolution mass spectrometry assessed in cultured hepatoma cell line, fungus, adb butinaca liver microsomes and confirmed using urine samples The threshold for fatal overdose of combined use of SCRAs and ethanol can be estimated as a little ng/mL (0.37–4.1 ng/mL according to the reported cases) of SCRA and 1.5–2.5 g/L of ethanol. The reported cases and reviews of the scientific literature suggest a possible synergistic effect between SCRAs and ethanol, because their combined use clearly increases their toxicity. The victim died due to severe necrotizing pancreatitis and acute kidney injury evolving into multi-organ failure 11 days after hospital admission . Studies have found no unequivocal synergistic effect between THC and ethanol at low or moderate ethanol doses [29, 30], but no data on high doses of ethanol are available. Given that THC and ethanol act on the same receptors, data on their simultaneous use may yield important insights in this regard.
Fungus C. elegans
Concentrations of 4F-MDMB-BINACA in the postmortem blood samples were 2.50 and 2.34 ng/mL, which are in line with published data. Although the lethal dose of 4F-MDMB-BINACA is unknown, its concentration in postmortem blood samples was found to range between 0.10 and 2.90 ng/mL . In SCRA-related cases in which the deceased suffered from heart disease, the SCRA concentration in the postmortem blood was less than 1 ng/mL . Concentrations of SCRAs in postmortem cases cover a wide range ; however, some reports of survival have also been published—even at relatively high blood SCRA concentrations [19, 20


Acute kidney damage and even kidney failure have been reported following use of synthetic cannabinoids (Davidson, et al., 2017). One recent study has looked at other mechanisms of action in some of the older synthetic cannabinoids and reported that some produced varying amounts of activity at sites which are related to cardiotoxicity and heart disease (Wiley et al., 2016). It is not known whether the increased toxicity is due only to activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors more strongly than Δ9-THC or whether these "super-strength" cannabinoids produce effects at other receptors. A major cause of concern is that some of the more recently seen synthetic cannabinoids are more likely to produce extremely toxic effects than the older synthetics (Tai and Fantegrossi, 2017


§ (3) of the Hungarian act of Forensic Experts (2016.XXIX), the data of the reported case can be utilized freely for scientific and educational purposes without special ethical permission. These results indicate that the simultaneous intoxication of SCRA and ethanol directly and exclusively caused the death of the two victims. The victims did not have any significant diseases that could have contributed to the outcome. Very limited data are available in the scientific literature about the possible effects of the combined consumption of SCRAs and ethanol. Several case reports describe that the presence of a little ng/mL (0.37–4.1) of SCRAs and a high—but not lethal—concentration of ethanol (1.45–2.7 g/L) directly and exclusively contributed to the death of the victim [24–27] (Table 2). The fact that 4F-MDMB-BINACA was not detected in postmortem urine samples is partly explained by the high rate of hepatic metabolism of SCRAs [11, 14, 22], but also suggests that the victims consumed 4F-MDMB-BINACA shortly before their death


LC-QTOF-MS represents a significant advancement in the field of drug detection, offering higher sensitivity, specificity, and a broader spectrum of detectable substances. Despite all negative results in the point-of-care test for recreational drugs, the liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) analysis showed that the liquid of the e-cigarette contained ADB-BUTINACA, a synthetic cannabinoid. We report a 27-year-old man who was admitted to the emergency room because of sudden adb butinaca headache, nausea, vertigo, red eyes and palpitations. Synthetic cannabinoids are gaining popularity globally and detection is not commonly available.
Data availability
When clinical presentation and/or initial DOA testing results are inconclusive, additional testing with LC-QTOF-MS can be valuable and is recommended. SCRAs and other NPS may not be detected by point-of-care DOA tests. In this case, the point-of-care DOA urine screening was not able to detect the synthetic cannabinoid ADB-BUTINAC