Neurotoxicity Of Synthetic Cannabinoids JWH-081 And JWH-210

Acute kidney damage and even kidney failure have been reported following use of synthetic cannabinoids (Davidson, et al., 2017). One recent study has looked at other mechanisms of action in some of the older synthetic cannabinoids and reported that some produced varying amounts of activity at sites which are related to cardiotoxicity and heart disease (Wiley et al., 2016). It is not known whether the increased toxicity is due only to activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors more strongly than Δ9-THC or whether these "super-strength" cannabinoids produce effects at other receptors. A major cause of concern is that some of the more recently seen synthetic cannabinoids are more likely to produce extremely toxic effects than the older synthetics (Tai and Fantegrossi, 2017


Morris water maze test was performed to evaluate the changes in learning and memory function. Only a few case reports about the dangers of some synthetic cannabinoids due to neurotoxicity have been published (Cohen et al., 2012; McGuinness et al., 2012; Harris and Brown, 2013; Hermanns et al., 2013). In addition, the lack of information about neurotoxicity of synthetic cannabinoids could allow abusers consume those substances undiscerningly. However, slight structural changes might cause biochemical properties including dependence liability and neurotoxicity. The substances used in the present study both possess naphthoylindole moiety as their parental structure. (B) The ratio of damaged cells containing pyknotic or condensed nuclei and low hematoxilin affinity to total cells were calculated in nucleus accumben


§ (3) of the Hungarian act of Forensic Experts (2016.XXIX), the data of the reported case can be utilized freely for scientific and educational purposes without special ethical permission. These results indicate that the simultaneous intoxication of SCRA and ethanol directly and exclusively caused the death of the two victims. The victims did not have any significant diseases that could have contributed to the outcome. Very limited data are available in the scientific literature about the possible effects of the combined consumption of SCRAs and ethanol. Several case reports describe that the presence of a little ng/mL (0.37–4.1) of SCRAs and a high—but not lethal—concentration of ethanol (1.45–2.7 g/L) directly and exclusively contributed to the death of the victim [24–27] (Table 2). The fact that 4F-MDMB-BINACA was not detected in postmortem urine samples is partly explained by the high rate of hepatic metabolism of SCRAs [11, 14, 22], but also suggests that the victims consumed 4F-MDMB-BINACA shortly before their death


As synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRA) are gaining popularity globally, clinicians have to understand that intoxication caused by vaping SCRA is not detected by commonly available tests. He confirmed that he had been vaping an electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) earlier that day just before the onset of his symptoms. Metabolic acidosis (1/3, 0/7) and respiratory acidosis (1/3, 0/7), All 10 patients recovered with supportive care, including intubation and ventilation for one case. In 3 cases ADB-BUTINACA was the only substance detected, while in seven other substances of misuse were also detected including other SCRA, opioids, benzodiazepines cocaine and pregabali


A limitation of this case report is that we did not have a urine sample available for additional NPS testing. Point-of-care DOA tests using urine to screen for misuse of multiple substances, regularly include cannabis, amphetamines, cocaine, opioids, benzodiazepines and methadone. THC, methamphetamine, SRCA, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and ketamine are likely to become volatile under the temperature of current e-cigarettes, while crack cocaine is hard to vaporise. A systematic review including data of 114 patients of which the majority was intoxicated due to SCRA smoking revealed that 45 % of the patients who present at the ER after an intoxication due to SCRA smoking recovered within 24 hours


Test 2 was performed everyday for 5 days after consecutive administration of the substances, including negative (vehicle) and positive (methamphetamine) controls. After the last administration, the first trial was performed. Morris water maze test was performed to evaluate the changes of learning and memory function through administration of the test substances. Generally, neurotoxicity of a substance is evaluated by animal behavioral aspects, i.e. functional observation battery (FOB) tests (O’Callaghan et al., 2014). Our results suggest that JWH-081 and JWH-210 may JWH-210 powder be neurotoxic substances through changing neuronal cell damages, especially in the core shell part of nucleus accumbens.
About Powder JWH-2


Some mice showed abnormal behaviors (catalepsy, loss of traction, convulsion) right after the administration of the tested substances. The locomotor activity of the mice was measured 30 min and 2 hrs after the last substance administration. We also examined their neurotoxicity using brain samples through histopathological diagnose, especially in the nucleus accumbens core region. In histopathological analysis, neural cells of the animals treated with the high dose (5 mg/kg) of JWH-081 or JWH-210 showed distorted nuclei and nucleus membranes in the core shell of nucleus accumbens, suggesting neurotoxicity.
Table of Conten